Anonymous asked: Ok so what's the difference between a style and an ethos?
Ah, yeah, I guess this distinction could have used some unpacking! In a music context, what I meant was basically this:
- “Style” is like the decisions you make, the way you do things: the sound, the aesthetic, the image. So, for instance, the way punk rock sounds would be a “style.”
- “Ethos” is more like guiding beliefs, the way you orient yourself toward the world — almost like the core stuff you’re using your style to convey. So, for instance, the idea of being punk (anti-authority, DIY, rebellious, whatever) would be an ethos.
I use punk as an example because I think it draws this split really neatly. Not all things that have the style of punk have the actual ethos/mentality, right? And most of the things people say have the ethos of punk aren’t actually using punk’s original style to convey it.
So that’s what I meant about those two words — hopefully the way I’m using them isn’t weird! The idea was that styles move around a lot, and can start communicating different things in different moments, but those issues of “ethos” often hang around a little longer. (See “punk” again.)
-
littlejoeii liked this
-
fragmentedreality liked this
-
douglasmartini liked this
-
towerofsleep liked this
-
givingupthegun liked this
-
screwrocknroll liked this
-
electrichoney liked this
-
epistrophy said:
web.pitas.com/tashpil…
-
stakeswerehigh liked this
-
purns liked this
-
ehmemo liked this
-
scudmissile liked this
-
absolutefucker liked this
-
midnight-cowboy liked this
-
agrammar posted this